The primary reasons behind international hotels implementing no pets allowed policies are to maintain cleanliness and hygiene standards. Pets shed fur, leave behind odors, or even cause damage to furniture or carpets. They might create an unpleasant environment for other guests.\u00a0 By enforcing this unfriendly policy, hotels can ensure that their rooms remain clean and odor-free for all visitors. Additionally, some guests may have allergies or sensitivities to pet dander or fur. Allowing pets in hotel rooms could potentially trigger allergic reactions in these individuals. Hotel managements wish to provide peace of mind to guests with allergies by ensuring that their rooms are free from allergens.\u00a0 Minimizing noise disturbances for their guests is yet another reason. There is always a possibility of barking or other noises that could disrupt neighboring rooms. Hotels have a responsibility to ensure the safety and comfort of all their guests. This includes considering those who may have fears or phobias related to animals. Even if a pet is typically well-behaved, unfamiliar surroundings and the presence of other guests could potentially trigger anxiety or aggression. But sometimes, usually in times of crisis, even rules are mostly made to be broken. When the war in Gaza broke out on October 7, hotels in Israel faced an unexpected challenge. More than a quarter million people were evacuated from their homes on the southern and northern fronts. They found shelter in hotels in safer areas all over the country.\u00a0 Many left everything behind but did not agree to leave their pets unguarded. They wanted to take them along in this time of crisis. Not everyone was allowed to bring their dogs or cats to hotels that provided a haven. In response, the Lawyers\u2019 Forum for the Protection of Animals in Israel appealed to numerous ministers. They demanded to urgently solve this, assist the evacuees with their pets, and urgently deal with the issue.\u00a0 \u201cIt turns out that some of the hotels that the government made available to the evacuees refuse to allow them to bring their pets that were evacuated with them. The pets are disconnected from their owners. They need them. This causes real harm to the pets and the refusal is a violation of the Animal Cruelty Law. They should be recognized as animals that provide mental support to evacuees, and therefore the law established for guide dogs applies to them,\u201d stated the appeal. Dani Shahar, director-general of the Tourism Ministry, supported the request and called the hoteliers in a letter to allow the pets to live with the evacuated families.\u00a0 \u201cPast experience in the world shows that evacuation with the animals is the most correct way for national resilience, public and animal health and their well-being,\u201d he requested and the majority of the hoteliers indeed ignored their own policies and allowed pets in their properties. When asked in a recent podcast what was the weirdest thing he had to handle during the Gaza war, Lior Raviv, managing director of \u00a0Isrotel, revealed: \u201cThere are endless cases, but what stands out is that it is the first time in the company\u2019s history we have hosted hundreds of dogs. Suddenly we have a new type of guest that we didn\u2019t know. We even opened a kind of a dog care department,\u201d he said. \u201cOnce the war started and we hosted evacuees, we accepted their pets without hesitation, as we believe they are part of the organic family,\u201d reveals David Tucker, general manager of Ramada by Wyndham Jerusalem Hotels and the voluntary chairman of Jerusalem\u2019s Hotel Association. \u201cIt wasn\u2019t at all easy to face pets in the hotel facilities, but we understood that it is part of a major crisis. We made sure that dogs must be on leashes at all times, barking dogs are never left alone, and entrance to restaurants was forbidden. But once the war is over and hotels in Jerusalem will return to routine, they will also return to their core policies. Most of them are not pet-friendly, excluding service dogs.\u201d Itamar Elitzur, head of the Eilat Hotels Association, explains that accepting pets in hotels during the war was due to the emergency situation, however, it created challenges. \u201cIn some cases, dogs were left for hours alone in guestrooms, which led to disturbances. Fear from pets by other guests became evident. As most Eilat hotels are in big closed structures, it created a difficulty. I can\u2019t see a change in the pet-friendly policy of the hotels once we return to normality. I am not aware so far of a single hotel that changed its official pet guidelines,\u201d Raviv points out that the Isrotel, with its 23 hotels, will certainly return to its no pets allowed accommodation.\u00a0 \u201cIs it because of the operational challenges you experienced during the war?\u201d I ask. \u201cThe main reason is because hotel guests here are less fond of vacationing with dogs around them. In the US, due to distances, there is a greater openness to animals because the guests arrive for relatively long periods. The hotel business model in Florida, for example, is suitable for such a reality. In Israel, vacations are short and pet owners are keen to find the appropriate short-term pet solutions at home,\u201d he explains. Optimistic views are also heard. Atlas Hotels is an Israeli brand with 16 urban properties and is a family business co-founded by Danny Lipman, with his sons Yaron and Lior now carrying the torch. This brand is exceptionally pet-friendly.\u00a0 \u201cIt all started with our other co-founder Leslie Adler, who arrived daily to work with his Labrador named Trixie,\u201d says vice president Yaron Lipman. \u201cMost hoteliers adopt a conservative approach towards pets, however, we do not see any obstacles. I can safely say that in most cases, dogs are better than human beings. We have no problem hosting guests with pets and we even supply beds and snacks for the animals. We hosted thousands of pets over the years and the problems were negligible. I am optimistic. During the war, hotels hosted evacuees with pets and they noticed that the problems were minor. Regardless of traditionally being against this, this experience will be positive and more hotels will accept the challenge.\u201d In the US, during the COVID-19 crisis, pet-friendly hospitality also made headlines. Booking.com reported at the time of the pandemic that \u201cthe pet-friendly filter was the third most-used filter in the hotel facilities section, behind swimming pools and parking.\u201d \u201cWhile in the US, the trend of pet-friendly hotels continues to grow, the supply of such hotels in Israel remains limited,\u201d says Eran Ketter, head of the Department of Tourism and Hotel Management at Kinneret College. \u201cPresenting a pet-friendly offering is an effective way for accommodation venues to create market differentiation, enhance customers\u2019 loyalty, and increase revenues. However, what works well in the US doesn\u2019t necessarily work well in Israel. Most hotel rooms here are in large buildings that don\u2019t have the facilities to host pets, unlike cabins and lodges in the US.\u00a0 \u201cIsraeli clientele are not well known for following regulations, and having pets in local hotels might increase the level of chaos, which is already quite high. Israelis are much more open than Americans to leaving their pets with family\/friends or having a dog-sitter coming into their homes, leading to a lower level of demand.\u00a0 \u201cLastly, many hotels in Israel, especially in a leisure destination like Eilat, already enjoy high occupancy rates, and don\u2019t need to make the extra effort in hosting pets.\u201d When I am urging Ketter to envision the future of pet-friendly hotels here, he says: \u201cPerhaps this is a trend waiting to happen, and when enough hotels will operate in the Israeli market, the demand will follow.\u201d The writer is the Travel Flash Tips publisher.<\/em>
\n\t\t\t\tNot leaving pets in times of crisis<\/strong><\/h3>
Is the war inspiring a rise in pet-friendly hotels?<\/strong><\/h3>