Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science.<\/p> <\/div> <\/div>
In 2022, a team of researchers published a paper showing that global sperm counts fell about 1.2% per year between 1973 and 2018. From the year 2000, that rate accelerated to more than 2.6% per year.<\/p>
\u201cWhat I think will grab people\u2019s attention with this study is the fact that plastic is in the testicles and potentially contributing to disarray in the function of the testicles,\u201d said Leonardo Trasande, a pediatrician and public policy expert at New York University\u2019s Grossman School of Medicine and Wagner School of Public Service. <\/p>
\u201cWhat should have gotten people excited all along is the fact that we\u2019ve known that the invisible chemicals \u2014 the phthalates, the bisphenols and the PFAS that are used in plastic materials \u2014 are already known to be problems,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd so if this is what it takes to get people\u2019s attention, I\u2019m a bit sad. Because we already had enough evidence that plastics were bad for testicular function.\u201d <\/p>
Others, including Philip Landrigan, director of the Program for Global Public Health and the Common Good at Boston College, said the study was \u201cconsistent with a whole series of papers that have come out now in the last few years\u201d showing these particles in a variety of organs, including the heart, liver, lungs and brain. <\/p>
\u201cIt\u2019s no surprise that microplastics are in the testes. The plastic is ubiquitous in today\u2019s world, the stuff breaks down, and the smaller the particle, the more easily it can move into and throughout the human body,\u201d he said.<\/p>
Xiaozhong Yu, a professor of environmental health at the University of New Mexico \u2014 and an author on this latest research \u2014 said he\u2019d been researching the effects of different chemicals on sperm production for years, and it was only recently that a colleague suggested he look for microplastics in testes.<\/p>
\u201cI said, \u2018Are you joking?\u2019,\u201d he said, recalling the conversation, explaining he was pretty certain he wouldn\u2019t find microplastics in tests because \u2014 like the brain \u2014 these sperm-generating factories are insulated by a protective barrier.<\/p>
Nevertheless, they gave it a go. <\/p>
They started by trying it out in dog testes. They were able to acquire 47 from neutering clinics. (The pet owners all provided permission.)<\/p>
They found microplastics in small dogs, big dogs, young dogs and old dogs. The plastic bits were in every dog testis they examined. The number ranged from 2.36 micrograms per gram to 485.77 micrograms per gram. The average was 122.63 micrograms per gram, and 12 polymers were identified. The most abundant were polyethylene \u2014 the material found in plastic packaging, films and bottles \u2014 and polyvinyl chloride \u2014 a material found in most household water pipes.<\/p>
He said he immediately went back to investigate their quality control. Maybe the testes had become contaminated at some point during the procedure or testing?<\/p>
He and his team were able to rule that out, although Landrigan noted that contamination was still possible \u2014 unless everything, from procurement to analysis had been done in a \u201cclean\u201d room devoid of all plastic.<\/p>
Yu and his team then decided to look at human samples. In the end, they were able to examine 23 testes from men ages 16 to 88. The tissue was acquired from males who had died in accidents and whose testes had been preserved post-autopsy. He said all samples were from men who had died in 2016 \u2014 made available following a seven-year storage requirement, after which time such samples are usually discarded.<\/p>
Once again, they found microplastics in every sample they examined, and as with the dog testes, there was wide variation \u2014 from 161.22 micrograms per gram to 695.94 micrograms per gram, with an average of 328.44 micrograms per gram \u2014 nearly three times greater than what they found in dogs.<\/p>
The microplastics in human testes were also composed of a variety of polymers, with polyethylene being the most common, followed by ABS (acrylonitrile, butadiene and styrene monomers \u2014 which is used to make a variety of products, including toys, automotive parts, medical equipment and consumer electronics), N66 (a kind of nylon), polyvinyl chloride and others.<\/p>
The researchers also noted a correlation between the concentrations of PVC and polyethylene and testes weight: The higher the concentration, the lower the weight.<\/p>
\u201cGenerally, a decreased testis weight is indicative of reduced spermatogenesis,\u201d wrote the authors in the paper.<\/p>
Yu said the difference in humans and dogs between polymer types \u2014 with dogs showing higher concentrations of PVC than men \u2014 likely has to do with lifestyle differences. He said consumer trends show a general aversion to eating or drinking out of bottles and foodware made from PVC, which contains bisphenol A \u2014 an additive that has been associated with health and developmental harm. <\/p>
However, he began looking at dog toys, and noticed many of them are made from this kind of plastic.<\/p>
\u201cPeople are choosing to avoid it,\u201d he said. But the market hasn\u2019t budged in the same way for dogs.<\/p>
Asked what the major route of exposure was for dogs and people, he said \u201cmicroplastics are everywhere \u2014 in the air, in the drinking water, in the food, in our clothes. We don\u2019t exactly know what is the most probable route. But they are everywhere.\u201d<\/p>
He also noticed variation within the groups. Dog testes acquired from public veterinary clinics showed higher levels of microplastics than those from private clinics, \u201cpotentially reflecting the influence of socioeconomic differences on the living environments and lifestyles of dogs.\u201d<\/p>
The researchers were also not able to find a correlation between age and microplastic concentration \u2014 a finding that surprised them. (Although men over the age of 55 had the least amount).<\/p>
\u201cThe absence of a distinct age-dependent accumulation of microplastics in human testes may be due to unique physiological and biological processes of spermatogenesis,\u201d they wrote, noting the continual renewal and release of sperm, which could \u201chelp mitigate the buildup of microplastics over time.\u201d<\/p>
That hypothesis, they noted, was supported by the presence of microplastics in human seminal fluid.<\/p>
\u201cThe reality is that the petrochemical industry has gotten a pass all these years,\u201d said Trasande, the NYU professor. \u201cWe know that plastics come from the petrochemical industry ... and it\u2019s no secret that we have paid as a society by letting the petrochemical industry pollute us. Now we\u2019re paying the consequences. And if we don\u2019t reverse course fairly quickly, we will have an even bigger problems before us because plastic consumption is growing, not slowing down.\u201d<\/p>
Landrigan agreed and noted that nations were currently in negotiations to sign a treaty that would curb the use of plastic and cap production.<\/p>
\u201cPlastic production is increasing exponentially,\u201d he said noting that it\u2019s increased more than 200-fold since the 1950s. He said plastic production is on a trajectory to double by 2040 and triple by 2060. There have been a total of about 8 billion tons of plastic produced since 1950, he said, and about 6 billion tons is \u201cfloating around us, most of it in the form of microplastics.\u201d<\/p>
He said the anatomical location of this latest microplastic discovery may hit close to home for lawmakers, who until this time, have not been too concerned.<\/p>
He said he\u2019d had to testify in the Senate several years ago about endocrine disruptors, and mentioned that sperm quantity was reduced in men who\u2019d been exposed.<\/p>
\u201cTwo senators sat back and unconsciously crossed their legs,\u201d he said. \u201cThe body language was amazing.\u201d<\/p>