The woman, identified by her surname Xu, resides in Hangzhou, eastern China.
She recounted her experience to the mainland media outlet Personage, revealing that she first adopted her Doberman, named Joker, in 2011. Over the years, Joker became more than just a pet—he was a steadfast companion, offering Xu an invaluable sense of security, particularly during the years she lived alone.
His passing devastated Xu, leaving her with severe insomnia, a weakened immune system, and frequent bouts of illness.
Reflecting on their decade together, she described Joker as her closest friend, a companion who had been by her side through her studies and the early years of her career.
Xu quickly noticed striking similarities between Joker and Little Joker.
Their appearances were nearly identical, down to a distinct black spot near the nose.
Little Joker also mimicked many of Joker’s behaviors, such as stealing socks, drinking water in the same manner, and carrying around the leash that Joker had used for years.
Despite these similarities, Xu acknowledged that Little Joker could never truly replace the original.
She continued to cherish Joker’s memory, keeping a notebook filled with his photographs.
However, caring for Little Joker provided her with comfort, helping her momentarily set aside the pain of her loss.
She viewed Little Joker not as a mere replica but as a new life deserving of love and care.
She expressed that her experience raising Joker had left her with certain regrets, and Little Joker gave her a second chance to nurture and cherish a beloved pet.
When Xu shared her story on social media, reactions were mixed.
Some questioned whether the cloning process harmed the surrogate animals involved.
In response, Xu reassured the public that the surrogates were well cared for by the cloning facility and that many were later adopted by pet lovers.
Public opinion remained divided.
One online commenter supported Xu’s decision, remarking that cloning was not about resurrecting the dead but about continuing love.
However, another countered that a pet’s soul could not be replicated, arguing that cloning to cope with loss reflected a human-centered perspective rather than a true understanding of the animal’s uniqueness.